South Korea splits its company data cleanly. For listed companies, the disclosure system DART, run by the financial regulator, is free and comprehensive, with financial statements, audit reports and filings available to anyone, including through an open API. For the private companies that make up the rest of the economy, the picture is very different: the data is dominated by two long-established credit bureaus.

Those two, NICE and Kodata, are the market for Korean private-company credit and firmographic data, with a bank-and-consumer bureau alongside and the local Dun & Bradstreet affiliate for international linkage. A strict privacy regime, tightened again for 2026, keeps the licensed bureaus firmly in control of contact and credit data. This guide sorts out the free listed-company layer and the paid private one.

It ranks {count} providers on merit. We sell Korean business data ourselves, so our pitch sits in a marked box rather than at number one.

In a hurry? The short answer

A Korean private-company credit report

NICE · The dominant bureau for corporate credit and evaluation

A second corporate-data source

Kodata · The bank-backed number two, with the CRETOP portal

A D-U-N-S linked or export report

NICE D&B · The D&B affiliate for international trade credit

Listed-company financials, free

DART · The free disclosure system for listed companies

Consumer and small-business credit

KCB · The largest personal-credit data pool

Korea plus other markets in one format

CompanyData · That is us. One schema across 200+ markets

Jump to a provider

1. NICE: the market leader

The dominant Korean bureau for private-company credit and corporate evaluation.

NICE Information Service, part of the NICE group, is the market leader for Korean corporate credit and firmographic data, covering personal credit scoring, corporate information and evaluation, and technology-credit assessment, delivered through products like NICE Bizline. For a credit report or corporate evaluation on a Korean private company, it is the default source, and its scale and data pool put it ahead of the rest.

Seoul, South Korea · Quote only · Built on: Corporate register, Financial data, Own research

✓ Why it stands out

  • The dominant Korean corporate-credit file
  • Credit, evaluation and technology scoring
  • Deep private-company coverage

⚠ Watch out for

  • No public pricing
  • Korean-language, Korea-first
  • Incumbent scale over flexibility

2. CompanyData

Full disclosure: where CompanyData fits in South Korea

We publish this guide and we sell Korean business data, so here is our pitch in the open rather than dressed up as an objective first place. Our Korean file is built for volume work: enrichment, segmentation and cross-border lists, in the same schema we use for 200+ other markets.

Where we are strong is naming the person in charge: we hold a named contact for almost every business in our Korean file. Where we are honest about being weaker: we hold almost no Korean email addresses, reflecting both how business communicates there and a strict privacy regime, and group relations are thin. We do not provide Korean credit scores or the DART disclosures. For credit go to NICE or Kodata, for listed financials to DART; for reach and structure across every market in one format, come to us.

2.7M

Korean businesses

2.6M

with a contact named

🏆 99% of the file, effectively complete

1.6M

phone or mobile

52K

with a website

52K

with group relations

4K

email addresses

email is rare in Korea

Korean credit scoring and disclosures are the bureaus' and DART's domain. What we add is reach and structure, including ownership structure links that map Korean parents to subsidiaries across borders.

See our Korean business data

3. Kodata: the number two

The bank-backed second bureau, formerly Korea Enterprise Data, with the CRETOP portal.

Founded in 2005 and renamed from Korea Enterprise Data to Kodata in 2022, this is the bank-and-guarantee-fund-backed number two to NICE. Its CRETOP portal and early-warning products deliver corporate credit investigation and rating, and it was the first private-sector technology credit bureau in Korea. For a second read on a Korean company alongside NICE, it is the natural pairing, with a distinctive ownership base behind it.

Seoul, South Korea · Quote only · Built on: Corporate register, Financial data, Own research

✓ Why it stands out

  • The established number-two bureau
  • CRETOP portal and early-warning tools
  • Bank and guarantee-fund backing

⚠ Watch out for

  • No public pricing
  • Smaller reach than NICE
  • Korea-focused

4. NICE D&B: the D&B route

The Korean D&B affiliate, for D-U-N-S linkage and cross-border trade credit.

NICE D&B, a listed joint venture formed in 2002 between the NICE group and Dun & Bradstreet, provides enterprise credit assessment, technology evaluation and, as the Korean D&B affiliate, international and export business-credit reports with D-U-N-S linkage. For tying a Korean company into a global risk picture or assessing overseas counterparties from Korea, it is the route into the worldwide D&B file.

Seoul, South Korea · Quote only · Built on: Corporate register, D&B network, Own research

✓ Why it stands out

  • D-U-N-S and international trade credit
  • Backed by both NICE and D&B
  • Enterprise and technology evaluation

⚠ Watch out for

  • No public pricing
  • Faced a regulatory penalty in 2024
  • Enterprise-oriented

5. KCB: the consumer bureau

The bank-owned personal-credit bureau, with small-business scoring alongside.

Korea Credit Bureau, founded in 2005 and owned by a consortium of financial institutions, is primarily a consumer credit bureau, with the largest personal-credit data pool in Korea, plus small-business credit scoring and business reporting. For company-level B2B data it is weaker than NICE or Kodata, but for small-business and owner credit, where the person and the business overlap, its consumer depth is genuinely useful.

Seoul, South Korea · Quote only · Built on: Financial institution data, Public agencies

✓ Why it stands out

  • The largest Korean personal-credit pool
  • Small-business and owner credit
  • Bank-owned data foundation

⚠ Watch out for

  • Consumer-first, weaker on company data
  • No public pricing
  • Korea-focused

6. DART: the free disclosure system

The free, official disclosure system for listed companies, and the market's free baseline.

DART, run by the Financial Supervisory Service, is the free electronic disclosure system for listed and disclosure-obligated Korean companies, with financial statements, audit reports and major-event filings, plus a free developer API. It is the free baseline the paid bureaus sit above: comprehensive for listed companies, but silent on the private majority. For listed-company financials, it is all you need, and it costs nothing.

Seoul, South Korea · Free · Built on: Listed-company filings

✓ Why it stands out

  • Free listed-company financials and filings
  • Free open API
  • Official regulator source

⚠ Watch out for

  • Listed companies only
  • Nothing on private firms
  • Not a credit or contact source

Want to weigh all the options yourself?

Our interactive tool ranks 92 B2B data providers worldwide. Filter by region, data type, budget and use case to build your own shortlist in seconds.

Compare 92 providers →

How Korea's data market took shape

Korea built a free listed-company disclosure system and let two bureaus own the private data:

1985 · NICE's lineage begins

The company that becomes NICE Information Service is founded, starting the dominant Korean corporate-credit franchise.

2005 · Kodata and KCB are founded

Korea Enterprise Data and Korea Credit Bureau are both established, shaping the modern private-data market.

2022 · KED becomes Kodata

Korea Enterprise Data rebrands as Kodata, refreshing the number-two corporate-data brand.

2026 · PIPA tightens again

A major amendment to the privacy law raises fines toward a share of revenue, reinforcing the licensed bureaus' hold on credit and contact data.

The Korean data landscape

The market is Korean-owned, structured around the NICE group and bank-backed bureaus:

Korean-owned

  • NICE (NICE group)
  • Kodata (banks and guarantee fund)
  • KCB (financial-institution consortium)
  • DART (government)

Global ties

  • NICE D&B (NICE and Dun & Bradstreet joint venture)

Free for the listed, paid for the rest

Korea's official data splits by company type. Every business has a ten-digit registration number from the tax service, whose status you can check free, and incorporated firms have a separate court corporate register whose extracts cost a small fee. For listed companies, the regulator's DART system publishes financial statements and filings free, with an open API, so listed-company data is genuinely accessible.

For the private majority, though, the data is concentrated in two bureaus, NICE and Kodata, and a strict privacy regime keeps them in control. Korea's personal-information and credit-information laws, tightened again for 2026, constrain scraping and reselling personal and contact data, which is a key reason licensed bureaus dominate. Check the free listed-company source here:

  • DART : The free electronic disclosure system for listed companies, with financials, filings and an open API.
  • Hometax : The tax service portal, where a business registration number's active status can be checked free.
  • IROS corporate register : The court registry for corporate register extracts, available for a small per-document fee.

Four questions before you sign anything

1. Listed, or private? For a listed Korean company, DART gives you the financials free. For a private company, which is most of the economy, you need a bureau, because the free disclosure system does not cover them.

2. Do you want a genuine second opinion? NICE dominates, so pairing it with Kodata gives you an independent read on the same company rather than one source twice.

3. Domestic, or cross-border? For a Korean company in a global risk picture, or overseas counterparties assessed from Korea, NICE D&B and the D-U-N-S linkage fit. For purely domestic credit, NICE or Kodata is enough.

4. Have you planned for the privacy rules? Korea's personal-information and credit-information laws are strict and were tightened for 2026. Assume you cannot freely scrape or resell personal and contact data, and rely on licensed bureaus for it.

Frequently asked questions

For listed companies, yes. DART, run by the financial regulator, publishes financial statements, audit reports and filings for listed and disclosure-obligated companies free, with an open API. You can also check a business registration number's status free on the tax portal. But for the private companies that make up most of the economy, the data is concentrated in the paid bureaus NICE and Kodata, and a strict privacy regime keeps contact and credit data in their hands.
NICE is the market leader for Korean corporate credit and evaluation, the default source, with the deepest private-company data pool. Kodata, the bank-backed former Korea Enterprise Data, is the established number two, with its CRETOP portal and early-warning tools. For a single Korean credit view NICE is the default; for a second, independent opinion, Kodata is the natural pairing. Many risk teams use both.
DART is South Korea's free electronic disclosure system, run by the Financial Supervisory Service, covering listed and disclosure-obligated companies with financial statements, audit reports and major-event filings, plus a free developer API. It is comprehensive for listed companies and costs nothing, which makes it the free baseline the paid bureaus sit above. What it does not cover is the private majority, which is where NICE and Kodata come in.
Only carefully. Korea's personal-information and credit-information laws are among the strictest anywhere and were tightened again for 2026, with penalties rising toward a share of revenue. That regime constrains scraping and reselling personal and contact data, and is a key reason the licensed bureaus dominate. For compliant credit and contact data you generally work through them, and any bought data needs a lawful basis under Korean law.
Because they solve a different problem and are constrained in Korea specifically. The global sales-intelligence platforms hold thin Korean coverage, Korea's strict privacy laws limit the contact data they rely on, and Korean business runs little on the email data they specialise in. For registration facts, financials and credit decisions in Korea, the local providers on this page are far ahead.